{rfName}
Ha

License and use

Altmetrics

Grant support

This work was partially supported by the European Commission [Administrative Arrangement No. JRC 34488-2016] and the H2020 BioMonitor project [grant agreement No. 773297]. Partial support was also received from Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) (RTA2017-00046-00-00), co-funded by FEDER 'Operational Program Smart-Growth' 2014-2020, for the project 'Bioeconomia 2030: Un analisis cuantitativo de las perspectivas a medio plazo en Espana'.

Analysis of institutional authors

Philippidis, GeorgeAuthor

Share

March 29, 2022
Publications
>
Article
Hybrid Gold

Has the European Union entered a bioeconomy transition? Combining an output-based approach with a shift-share analysis

Publicated to:Environment Development And Sustainability. 24 (6): 8195-8217 - 2022-06-01 24(6), DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01780-8

Authors: Ronzon, Tevecia; Iost, Susanne; Philippidis, George

Affiliations

European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr JRC, Edificio Expo,Calle Inca Garcilaso 3, Seville 41092, Spain - Author
Govt Aragon, Ctr Agrofood Res & Technol CITA, Aragonese Agcy Res & Dev ARAID, Agrifood Inst Aragon IA2, Zaragoza, Spain - Author
Thunen Inst Int Forestry & Forest Econ, Hamburg, Germany - Author
Wageningen Univ, Agr Econ & Rural Policy Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands - Author

Abstract

The bioeconomy is a collective of activities charged with the production of biologically renewable resources or 'biomass' (e.g. agriculture, forestry), its diverse application (e.g. food, textiles, construction, chemicals) and subsequent reuse (e.g. compositing, waste management). Since the European Union (EU) launched its bioeconomy strategy in 2012, further bioeconomy policy initiatives have proliferated at regional, national and pan-European levels. Moreover, the EU Green Deal announced in 2019 targets a transition towards a low-carbon sustainable model of growth, food and energy security, biodiversity and natural resource management, where it is envisaged that the bioeconomy will play a key role. Despite a paucity of available data, the surge in policy interest has triggered the need for evidence-based monitoring of bioeconomy sectors and the efficient tailoring of policy support. Thus, on a Member State (MS) basis for the period 2008-2017, we (1) adopt an 'output-based' approach to construct a panel data of performance indicators and (2) characterise the sources of growth and transitional stage of the bioeconomy. Results reveal that the bioeconomy has maintained its relative importance within the total EU27 economy. At the EU level, agriculture and the food industry have played a key role in driving a transition in the primary and industrial bioeconomy sectors due to their significant labour productivity-enhancing impact. Four Northern MS exhibit a bioeconomy transition by modernising their bioeconomy activities and operating structural changes. Other Northern and Western EU MS are still in the early stages of a transition, whilst in Eastern and Central Europe, such a transition remains elusive.

Keywords

BioeconomyEmploymentEuropeProductivityProductsStructural changeTransitionValue added

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Environment Development And Sustainability due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2022, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Geography, Planning and Development.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 2.18. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 3.24 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 9.51 (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-09, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 26
  • Scopus: 33

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-09:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 102.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 110 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 4.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 2 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Belgium; Germany; Netherlands.

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: Last Author (Philippidis, George).