{rfName}
A

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Grant support

This study was supported by the EU Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Action (RIA) through the project 'Innovation for sustainable sheep and Goat production in Europe (iSAGE)' under grant agreement 679302.

Analysis of institutional authors

Martin-Collado, DAuthor

Share

April 12, 2021
Publications
>
Article

A multi-stakeholder participatory study identifies the priorities for the sustainability of the small ruminants farming sector in Europe

Publicated to:Animal. 15 (2): 100131- - 2021-03-09 15(2), DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100131

Authors: Belanche, A; Martin-Collado, D; Rose, G; Yanez-Ruiz, D R

Affiliations

Agrifood Res & Technol Ctr Aragon CITA, Anim Prod & Hlth Unit, Gobierno Aragon, Ave Montanana 930, Zaragoza 50059, Spain - Author
Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Vet Med, POB 393, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece - Author
Estn Expt Zaidin CSIC, Prof Albareda 1, Granada 18008, Spain - Author
Univ New England, Meat & Livestock Australia, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia - Author
Univ Zaragoza, CITA, Agrifood Inst Aragon IA2, E-50013 Zaragoza, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

The European small ruminants ( i.e. sheep and goats) farming sector (ESRS) provides economic, social and environmental benefits to society, but is also one of the most vulnerable livestock sectors in Europe. This sector has diverse livestock species, breeds, production systems and products, which makes difficult to have a dear vision of its challenges through using conventional analyses. A multi-stakeholder and multi-step approach, including 90 surveys, was used to identify and assess the main challenges for the sustainability of the ESRS to prioritize actions. These challenges and actions were identified by ESRS experts including farmers, cooperatives, breeding associations, advisers and researchers of six EU countries and Turkey. From the 30 identified challenges, the most relevant were economy-related challenges such as 'uncertainty of meat and milk prices', 'volatility of commodity prices'. 'low farm income', 'high subsidy dependency' and 'uncertainty in future changes in subsidies' resulting in 'a sector not attractive to young farmers'. Most of these challenges were beyond the farmer's control and perceived as difficult to address. Challenges were prioritized using an index, calculated by multiplying the relevance and the feasibility to address measures. The identified challenges had a similar priority index across the whole sector with small differences across livestock species (sheep vs goats), type of products (meat vs dairy) and intensification levels (intensive vs semi-intensive vs extensive). The priorities were different, however, between sodo-geographical regions (Southern vs Central Europe). Some of the top prioritized challenges were linked to aspects related to the production systems ('low promotion of local breeds' and 'slow adaptability of high producing breeds') and market practices ('unfair trade/lack of traceability). The majority of the priority challenges, however, were associated with a deficient knowledge or training at farm level ('poor business management training', 'lack of professionalization', 'slow adoption of innovations'), academia ('researchers do not address real problems') and society as a whole ('low consumer education in local products', 'low social knowledge about farming', 'poor recognition of farming public services'). Thus, improved collaboration among the different stakeholders across the food chain with special implication of farmers, associations of producers, academia and governments is needed to facilitate knowledge exchange and capacity building. These actions can contribute to make ESRS economically more sustainable and to adapt the production systems and policy to the current and future societal needs in a more region-contextualized framework. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Animal Consortium.

Keywords

dairygoat productionmeatsheep productionAgricultural landAgricultureAnimalAnimalsDairyEuropeFarmsGoat productionMeatRuminantRuminantsSheepSheep productionSustainabilityTurkeyTurkey (bird)

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Animal due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2021, it was in position 10/145, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Veterinary Sciences. Notably, the journal is positioned above the 90th percentile.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 3.78. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 4.32 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 9.36 (source consulted: Dimensions Oct 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-10-22, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 32
  • Scopus: 35
  • Europe PMC: 6
  • Google Scholar: 3

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-10-22:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 186.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 194 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 0.5.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 1 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Australia; Granada; Greece.