{rfName}
Fa

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

16

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Martín-Collado DAuthor

Share

August 5, 2020
Publications
>
Article
No

Farmers’ stated selection preferences differ from revealed AI bull selection in Finnish dairy herds

Publicated to:Livestock Science. 240 (104117): 104117- - 2020-10-01 240(104117), DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104117

Authors: Paakala, Elina; Martin-Collado, Daniel; Maki-Tanila, Asko; Juga, Jarmo

Affiliations

Agrifood Res & Technol Ctr Aragon CITA, Anim Prod & Hlth Unit, Avda Montanana 930, Zaragoza 50059, Spain - Author
Centro de Investigaci?n y Tecnolog?a Agroalimentaria de Arag?n - Author
Faba Coop, Urheilutie 6D, FI-01370 Vantaa, Finland - Author
Finnish Animal Breeding Association - Author
Helsingin Yliopisto - Author
Univ Helsinki, Dept Agr Sci, POB 28, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland - Author
Univ Zaragoza, CITA, AgriFood Inst Aragon IA2, Calle Miguel Servet 177, Zaragoza 50013, Spain - Author
Universidad de Zaragoza - Author
See more

Abstract

Keywords

Analytic hierarchy processBreeding objectiveBreeding objectivesCattleCriteriaDaily cattleDairy cattleDesired genetic gainsTotal merit indexTrait preferenceTraits

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Livestock Science due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2020, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Veterinary (Miscellaneous).

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 2.42, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-04, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 8
  • Scopus: 8

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-04:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 40.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 40 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 7.
  • The number of mentions in news outlets: 1 (Altmetric).

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Finland.