{rfName}
St

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

Altmetrics

Grant support

This research was funded by the European Commission (grant agreement 728003).

Analysis of institutional authors

Franco-Luesma, SamuelAuthor

Share

May 19, 2025
Publications
>
Article
No

Stakeholders' Preferences for Sustainable Agricultural Practices in Mediterranean Cereal Cropping Systems

Publicated to:Sustainability. 17 (9): 4219- - 2025-05-07 17(9), DOI: 10.3390/su17094219

Authors: Calatrava, Javier; Alvaro-Fuentes, Jorge; Martinez-Granados, David; Franco-Luesma, Samuel; Gomez-Lopez, Maria Dolores

Affiliations

CSIC, Soil & Water Dept, EEAD, Zaragoza 50059, Spain - Author
Ctr Invest & Tecnol Agroalimentaria Aragon CITA, Dept Agr Syst Forestry & Environm, Zaragoza 50059, Spain - Author
Univ Castilla La Mancha, Dept Plant Prod & Agr Technol, Albacete 02071, Spain - Author
Univ Cordoba, Dept Agr Econ Finance & Accounting, Campus Rabanales, Cordoba 14071, Spain - Author
Univ Politecn Cartagena, Sustainable Use Management & Reclamat Soil & Water, Dept Agr Engn, Cartagena 30203, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

This study assesses local stakeholders' perceptions regarding how a Mediterranean cereal-based cropping system could transition to a more sustainable production, focusing on the identification of the most suitable alternatives for their diversification. Fifty-four stakeholders from the Aragon region in Spain, including farmers, technical advisors, public agricultural officers, local researchers, and experts from environmental NGOs, were consulted. Their responses were analysed using multi-criteria decision-making techniques to order their preferences for different farming practices and diversification strategies. Stakeholders' responses suggest a priority for balancing soil conservation with the economic viability and continuity of farms. This is evident not only in its consideration as a priority objective but also in their preferences for farming practices, where their implications for farm profitability, especially through the choice of less costly alternatives, are a main concern. This economic rationale also influences their choice of crop diversification alternatives, with a preference for short (two-year) rotations in rainfed cereals and double cropping in irrigated cereals, showing a consideration of the balance between environmental and economic sustainability, and for diversification crops that farmers are already familiar with, aiming both to reduce the uncertainties linked to new crops and to minimise the need for technical support.

Keywords

Agricultura de bajo insumoAnálisis de las partes interesadasCarbonConservation agricultureCrop rotationsCultivo intercaladoCultivo múltipleDelphi methodDiversificationEconomic sustainabilityEcosystem servicesIntercroppinIntercroppingLow-input farming practicesManagementMulticriteria analysisMultiple croppingRotación de cultivosSostenibilidadStakeholders' assessmentStakeholders’ assessmentStrategiesTillage systemsTopsisYiel

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Sustainability due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2025, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category .

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-22:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 2 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

    It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is: