{rfName}
Yi

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Martínez-Peña FAuthor

Share

January 23, 2020
Publications
>
Article

Yield models for predicting aboveground ectomycorrhizal fungal productivity in Pinus sylvestris and Pinus pinaster stands of northern Spain

Publicated to:Forest Ecosystems. 6 (1): 52- - 2019-12-01 6(1), DOI: 10.1186/s40663-019-0211-1

Authors: Sanchez-Gonzalez, Mariola; de-Miguel, Sergio; Martin-Pinto, Pablo; Martinez-Pena, Fernando; Pasalodos-Tato, Maria; Andres Oria-de-Rueda, Juan; Martinez de Aragon, Juan; Canellas, Isabel; Antonio Bonet, Jose

Affiliations

Agrotecnio Centre de Recerca en Agrotecnologia - Author
Centro de Investigaci?n y Tecnolog?a Agroalimentaria de Arag?n - Author
Ctr Invest & Tecnol Agroalimentaria Aragon CITA, Avda Montana 230, E-50059 Zaragoza, Spain - Author
Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2). Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón - Author
Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria - Author
Joint Res Unit CTFC AGROTECNIO, Ave Alcalde Rovira Roure 191, E-25198 Lleida, Spain - Author
Spanish Natl Inst Agr & Food Res & Technol INIA, Ctra La Coruna Km 7,5, E-28040 Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Lleida, Dept Crop & Forest Sci, Ave Rovira Roure 191, E-25198 Lleida, Spain - Author
Univ Valladolid Palencia, Sustainable Forest Management Res Inst, Avda Madrid 44, E-34071 Palencia, Spain - Author
Universidad de Valladolid - Author
Universitat de Lleida - Author
See more

Abstract

Keywords

FungiHurdle modelsMixed modelsMushroomsNon-wood forest products

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Forest Ecosystems due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2019, it was in position 8/68, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Forestry.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 2.58, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-07, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 14
  • Scopus: 13
  • Google Scholar: 15

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-07:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 53.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 53 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 3.85.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 6 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.