{rfName}
Pl

Indexed in

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Mallor CAuthor

Share

February 5, 2019
Publications
>
Review

Plant Genebanks: Present Situation and Proposals for Their Improvement. the Case of the Spanish Network.

Publicated to:Frontiers In Plant Science. 9 (1794): 1794-1794 - 2018-12-04 9(1794), DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01794

Authors: Jose Diez, Maria; De la Rosa, Lucia; Martin, Isaura; Guasch, Luis; Elena Cartea, Maria; Mallor, Cristina; Casals, Joan; Simo, Joan; Rivera, Ana; Anastasio, German; Prohens, Jaime; Soler, Salvador; Blanca, Jose; Vicente Valcarcel, Jose; Casanas, Francesc

Affiliations

Agrifood Research and Technology Centre of Aragón, Agrifood Institute of Aragón, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain. - Author
BarcelonaTech, Dept Agrifood Engn & Biotechnol, Miquel Agusti Fdn, Mixed Unity Valorizat & Breeding Hort Landraces, Castelldefels, Spain - Author
Department of Plant Breeding, FITO Seeds, Barcelona, Spain. - Author
FITO Seeds, Dept Plant Breeding, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Group of Genetics, Breeding and Biochemistry of Brassicas, Misión Biológica de Galicia, Spanish Council for Scientific Research, Pontevedra, Spain. - Author
Institute for the Conservation and Improvement of Valencian Agrodiversity, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain. - Author
Mixed Unity for the Valorization and Breeding of Horticultural Landraces, Institute for the Conservation and Improvement of Valencian Agrodiversity, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain. - Author
Mixed Unity for the Valorization and Breeding of Horticultural Landraces, Miquel Agustí Foundation. Department of Agrifood Engineering and Biotechnology, BarcelonaTech, Castelldefels, Spain. - Author
Natl Inst Agr & Food Res & Technol, Spanish Plant Genet Resources Natl Ctr, Alcala De Henares, Spain - Author
Spanish Council Sci Res, Mision Biol Galicia, Grp Genet Breeding & Biochem Brass, Pontevedra, Spain - Author
Spanish Plant Genetic Resources National Center, National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology, Alcalá de Henares, Spain. - Author
Univ Politecn Valencia, Inst Conservat & Improvement Valencian Agrodivers, Mixed Unity Valorizat & Breeding Hort Landraces, Valencia, Spain - Author
Univ Politecn Valencia, Inst Conservat & Improvement Valencian Agrodivers, Valencia, Spain - Author
Univ Zaragoza, Agrifood Inst Aragon, Agrifood Res & Technol Ctr Aragon, Zaragoza, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

Genebanks were created by the middle of the twentieth century to preserve cultivated biodiversity when landraces began to be substituted by modern varieties. This move was generally accepted as a necessary step to safeguard the future. After about 75 years of collecting and maintaining genetic resources, the increasing ability of biotechnology to create new variability brings the roles of genebanks in the present and near future into question. As a continuation of several workshops that started in 2014, staff of some representative genebanks have met to discuss how the Spanish Plant Genetic Resources Network can be improved, identifying the following major shortcomings: lack of efficient coordination in the distribution of species among genebanks; too many genebanks; existence of detected and undetected duplicates; insufficient rate of regeneration; insufficient phenotyping, genotyping, and epiphenotyping; unsatisfactory rate of use by end users; and, insufficient funding. As a considerable increase in public funding is unlikely, we propose some strategies to increase the efficiency of the system. The most urgent tasks are to strengthen the rationalization of the network by establishing a clear hierarchy and functions, to improve the information in the base collection by deep characterization including not only phenotypes but also uses and utilities, to progressively replace the active collections with focused core collections constructed to meet users' needs, to optimize regeneration protocols, to limit new collecting expeditions of Spanish crop wild relatives to those growing in threatened habitats, and to develop user-friendly platforms to access germplasm documentation, including a unified system of descriptors and classification categories. Current advances in biotechnology, and especially those in gene editing will have without doubt an impact on the role of genebanks. However, the high number of genes and gene combinations created by evolution they hold cannot be produced by these techniques at present. So, these reservoirs of variability will continue to be indispensable for the near-medium future while the function of all the genes is unveiled. In turn, biotechnologies and gene editing will allow us to take advantage of the information held in genebanks in a more efficient and fast way, contributing to a better rationalization and functioning.

Keywords

crop wild relativesex situ conservationgene conservationgenetic variabilitylandracesphenotypic variationplant genetic resourcesCrop wild relativesEx situ conservationGene conservationGenetic variabilityLandracesPhenotypic variationPlant genetic resourcesSeedbanks

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Frontiers In Plant Science due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2018, it was in position 20/228, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Plant Sciences. Notably, the journal is positioned above the 90th percentile.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 1.72. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 2.4 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 13.86 (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-18, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 42
  • Scopus: 53
  • Europe PMC: 26

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-18:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 120.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 124 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 3.5.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 7 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.