{rfName}

Indexed in

License and Use

Licencia Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Impact on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Analysis of institutional authors

Martin‐collado, DanielAuthor

Share

January 30, 2026
Publications
>
Article
No

Expanding the life framework of values

Publicated to: People And Nature. - 2026-01-27 (), DOI: 10.1002/pan3.70243

Authors:

[+]

Affiliations

Departamento de Ciencia Animal Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón (CITA) Zaragoza Spain, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón IA2 (CITA‐Universidad de Zaragoza) Zaragoza Spain - Author
Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering University of Trento Trento Italy - Author
Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering University of Trento Trento Italy, Centre Agriculture Food Environment San Michele all'Adige Italy - Author
Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering University of Trento Trento Italy, Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management University of Inland Norway Koppang Norway - Author
Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management University of Inland Norway Koppang Norway, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research Lillehammer Norway - Author
Faculty of Life Sciences Thaer‐Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) Müncheberg Germany, Department of Human Behavior, Ecology and C - Author
Faculty of Life Sciences Thaer‐Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) Müncheberg Germany, Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Depart - Author
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research Lillehammer Norway - Author
See more

Abstract

Conceptualising and organising the range of value orientations and worldviews underpinning human–nature relationships is useful for understanding different, and sometimes conflicting, perspectives on how nature should be managed and working towards just and equitable policies. We test the applicability and current scope of the Life Framework of Values (living from-, living in-, living with- and living as-nature) by aligning it with pre-existing literature, drawn heavily from the context of wildlife management and conservation, but with wider relevance. Pre-existing value categorisations align with the Life Framework of Values in accounting for instrumental, relational and intrinsic values of nature. However, the framework does not account for the multiple ways in which people may be considered as living against-, living separated from- and living disconnected from-/living indifferently to-nature. By first considering these additional worldviews, we then propose the introduction of a complimentary overarching living apart from nature value frame. We identify three pathways by which people may fall within the living apart from nature frame: (1) loving nature so deeply that you choose to separate yourself from it (living separated from nature), (2) disregarding nature to the extent that you are willing to destroy it (living against nature) and (3) becoming indifferent or disconnected, a state that can emerge from modern urban lifestyles (living disconnected from-/living indifferently to-nature). Synthesis and applications. Including the living apart from nature frame to the Life Framework of Values allows for a more realistic and complete view of the diversity of human–nature interactions thus helping it contribute to addressing the global biodiversity crisis and transforming societies towards more sustainable pathways. Future research should focus on empirically testing the extent to which people fit discretely and consistently into Life Frames or worldviews as opposed to simultaneously holding diverse positions on different specific issues.
[+]

Keywords

Asociación de colaboración sobre manejo sostenible de la fauna silvestreBiodiversidadConservación de la naturalezaLife on landMedio ambienteSostenibilidad

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal PEOPLE AND NATURE due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2026, it was in position 5/74, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Biodiversity Conservation.

[+]

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2026-04-20:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 1.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 1 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 1.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 1 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Assignment of a Handle/URN as an identifier within the deposit in the Institutional Repository: http://hdl.handle.net/10532/8121
Continuing with the social impact of the work, it is important to emphasize that, due to its content, it can be assigned to the area of interest of ODS 15 - Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss, with a probability of 58% according to the mBERT algorithm developed by Aurora University.
[+]

Awards linked to the item

Esta investigación fue financiada principalmente por Biodiversa+, la Asociación Europea para la Biodiversidad, en el contexto del proyecto TransWILD, en el marco de la convocatoria conjunta BiodivProtect 2021-2022, cofinanciada por la Comisión Europea (GA n.º 101052342) y las siguientes organizaciones de financiación: AEI (Agencia Estatal de Investigación), BNSF (Fondo Nacional Búlgaro para la Ciencia), MUR (Ministerio Italiano de Universidades e Investigación), FB (Fundación Biodiversidad), RCN (Consejo de Investigación de Noruega, contrato 342821) y VDI-VDE-IT/BMBF (Ministerio Federal de Educación e Investigación). En las etapas finales de desarrollo, también fue financiado por el programa Horizonte Europa de la Unión Europea a través del proyecto CoCo (acuerdo de subvención 101181958). Publicación de acceso abierto facilitada por la Universita degli Studi di Trento, como parte del acuerdo Wiley - CRUI-CARE.
[+]

Related Items