{rfName}
Ef

Indexed in

APC

1 510,00 Euros

License and Use

Icono OpenAccess

Citations

1

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Franco Luesma, SamuelAuthor

Share

January 20, 2026
Publications
>
Article

Effect of preceding integrated and organic farming on 15N recovery and the N balance, including emissions of NH3, N2O, and N2 and leaching of NO3-

Publicated to: Biogeosciences. 22 (18): 5081-5102 - 2025-09-29 22(18), DOI: 10.5194/bg-22-5081-2025

Authors:

Khan, Fawad; Franco Luesma, Samuel; Hartmann, Frederik; Dannenmann, Michael; Gasche, Rainer; Scheer, Clemens; Gattinger, Andreas; Niether, Wiebke; Gachibu Wangari, Elizabeth; Mwangada Mwanake, Ricky; Kiese, Ralf; Wolf, Benjamin
[+]

Affiliations

Agri Food Res & Technol Ctr Aragon CITA, Dept Environm Agr & Forest Syst, Zaragoza 50059, Spain - Author
Justus Liebig Univ, Chair Organ Farming Focus Sustainable Soil Use, Karl Glockner Str 21C, D-35392 Giessen, Germany - Author
Karlsruhe Inst Technol KIT, Inst Meteorol & Climate Res Atmospher Environm Res, D-82467 Garmisch Partenkirchen, Germany - Author
See more

Abstract

Ecological intensification strategies in agriculture, including organic fertilization and diversified crop rotations, aim to reduce nitrogen (N) losses to the environment. However, studies on N allocation and loss on adjacent sites with the same pedoclimatic conditions but different management histories, i.e. organic farming (OF) with frequent legume cultivation and occasional organic fertilizer input, compared to integrated farming (IF) with synthetic and organic fertilizers, have remained scarce. Understanding how these systems differ in their N dynamics is essential for improving nutrient management strategies, mitigating environmental impacts, and guiding sustainable agricultural practices. Here, we quantified field N losses (ammonia, nitrous oxide, dinitrogen, and nitrate leaching), total N balances, and 15N-labelled cattle slurry allocation to soil and plants of two adjacent sites over a 2-year cropping sequence. While IF had resulted in significantly higher pH and soil organic carbon and N content, the emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide, and dinitrogen after cattle slurry application as well as nitrate leaching were not significantly different across the two farming techniques. Ammonia losses were low for all cultivation periods, indicating that drag hose application and manure incorporation successfully mitigate ammonia emissions. High 15N fertilizer recovery in plants and soil, along with a low share of unrecovered 15N, agreed well with the low directly measured N losses. On average, 15N recovery was lower for OF (85 % versus 93 % in IF), likely due to unaccounted N2 emissions, which could only be measured within 2 weeks after fertilizer application, but the high spatial variability of 15N recovery may have turned this difference insignificant. Significantly higher harvest biomass N for IF demonstrated that management history affected productivity through increased soil organic matter mineralization. Due to the higher productivity, the cumulative N balance across all cultivation periods was neutral within the limits of the measurement uncertainty for IF (-8 +/- 15 kgNha-1), indicating an optimized N management. For OF, the N balance across a single cultivation period ranged from -19 to 41 kgNha-1; thus, the observations of a single cultivation period were inconclusive. The cumulative positive N balance (48 +/- 14 kgNha-1) across all cultivation periods for OF suggests that more frequent organic fertilizer additions could increase soil N (and carbon) stocks and finally improve yield. However, the positive N balance, coupled with lower 15N recovery for OF, also points to a higher likelihood of unaccounted N losses, which would, in turn, slow down the accumulation of soil N and C over time.
[+]

Keywords

Agricultura orgánicaAmmonia volatilizationAmoniacoBalance de nitrógenoCattleCropping systemDenitrificationEstiércolFateGas-flux methodNitrateNitrous-oxidePig slurryRotación de cultivosSistemas integrados de producción agropecuariaSoil

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Biogeosciences due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2025, it was in position 38/200, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Ecology.

Independientemente del impacto esperado determinado por el canal de difusión, es importante destacar el impacto real observado de la propia aportación.

Según las diferentes agencias de indexación, el número de citas acumuladas por esta publicación hasta la fecha 2026-03-07:

  • WoS: 1
[+]

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2026-03-07:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 9.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 10 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 2.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 1 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Assignment of a Handle/URN as an identifier within the deposit in the Institutional Repository: http://hdl.handle.net/10532/7959
[+]

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Germany.

[+]

Awards linked to the item

The research was funded by the Federal Ministry of Nutrition and Agriculture (BMEL), Germany, with grant nos. 2220NR083A and 2220NR083B.
[+]