{rfName}
Co

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Martin-Collado D.Author

Share

June 29, 2025
Publications
>
Other
No

Comparative stakeholder perceptions of wildlife management in five European multi-use landscapes

Publicated to:Journal Of Environmental Management. 389 - 2025-08-01 389(), DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126186

Authors: Kiffner C; Linnell JDC; Capelli S; Ciolli M; Iglesias A; Jewell K; Kaltenborn B; König HJ; Martin-Collado D; Prodanova H; Soriano B; Stoycheva V; Tattoni C; Uthes S; Volani S; Zöller M; Ostermann-Miyashita EF

Affiliations

Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón; Universidad de Zaragoza - Author
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin - Author
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF) e. V.; Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie - Author
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF) e. V.; University of Oxford - Author
Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF) e. V. - Author
National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Author
Trondheim hovedkontor - Author
Trondheim hovedkontor; University of Inland Norway - Author
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid - Author
Universita degli Studi dell'Insubria - Author
Università di Trento - Author
Università di Trento; Università di Trento - Author
Universität Greifswald - Author
University of Inland Norway; Università di Trento - Author
See more

Abstract

Keywords

Animal salvajeConservación del ecosistemaConservation conflictHuman-wildlife coexistenceHuman-wildlife conflictHuman-wildlife interactionsPartes interesadasParticipación de agricultoresParticipatory methodsProtección ambientalProtected areas

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Journal Of Environmental Management due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2025, it was in position 35/358, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Environmental Sciences. Notably, the journal is positioned above the 90th percentile.

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-13:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 6.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 6 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 1.85.

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Bulgaria; Germany; Italy; Norway; United Kingdom.