{rfName}
Ac

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Navarro-Rocha, JulianaAuthor

Share

September 24, 2024
Publications
>
Article

Acaricidal and Insect Antifeedant Effects of Essential Oils From Selected Aromatic Plants and Their Main Components

Publicated to:Frontiers In Agronomy. 3 662802- - 2021-05-19 3(), DOI: 10.3389/fagro.2021.662802

Authors: Valcarcel, Felix; Olmeda, A Sonia; Gonzalez, Marta G; Andres, Maria Fe; Navarro-Rocha, Juliana; Gonzalez-Coloma, Azucena

Affiliations

CSIC, Inst Ciencias Agr, Madrid, Spain - Author
Ctr Invest & Tecnol Agr Aragon CITA, Unidad Recursos Forestales, Zaragoza, Spain - Author
Inst Nacl Invest Agr INIA, Dept Reprod Anim, Grp Parasitol Anim, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Complutense Madrid UCM, Fac Vet, Dept Sanidad Anim, Madrid, Spain - Author

Abstract

Keywords

Adult hyalomma-marginatumAntifeedantAromatic plantBiological-activitiesBotanical insecticidesChemical-compositionColorado potato beetleEssential oilFumigant toxicitHyalomma lusitanicumHyssopus-officinalisIxodicidalL. essential oilLamiaceae essential oilsLeptinotarsa-decemlineata sayMyzus persicaeRhopaslosiphum padRhopaslosiphum padiSpodoptera littoralis

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Frontiers In Agronomy, Q4 Agency Scopus (SJR), its regional focus and specialization in Soil Science, give it significant recognition in a specific niche of scientific knowledge at an international level.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations from Scopus Elsevier, it yields a value for the Field-Weighted Citation Impact from the Scopus agency: 5.69, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 8.22 (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-02, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 34
  • Scopus: 41

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-02:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 55.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 55 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 0.5.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 1 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.