{rfName}
Un

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

7

Altmetrics

Grant support

The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their thoughtful comments and efforts towards improving our manuscript. Enrique Munoz-Ulecia is supported by a contract from the EU project LIFE PollinAction (LIFE19 NAT/IT/000848) .

Analysis of institutional authors

Muñoz-Ulecia, EnriqueAuthor

Share

July 18, 2024
Publications
>
Article
No

Uneven development and core-periphery dynamics: A journey into the perspective of ecologically unequal exchange

Publicated to:Environmental Science & Policy. 157 103778- - 2024-07-01 157(), DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103778

Authors: Corsi, Giulio; Guarino, Raffaele; Munoz-Ulecia, Enrique; Sapio, Alessandro; Franzese, Pier Paolo

Affiliations

Ciencia Animal. Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón - Author
Parthenope Univ Naples, Dept Business & Econ Studies, Naples, Italy - Author
Parthenope Univ Naples, UNESCO Chair Environm Resources & Sustainable Dev, Dept Sci & Technol, Int PhD Programme, Naples, Italy - Author
Univ Zaragoza, Ctr Invest & Tecnol Agroalimentaria Aragon CITA, Spain Inst Agroalimentario Aragon IA2, Zaragoza, Spain - Author

Abstract

There is an imperative need to transition towards sustainable societies to mitigate the consequences of the ongoing social -ecological crisis. This transition not only requires technical advancements, but also the reconsideration of our environmental paradigms and policies shaping the inter -relationships between human societies and natural ecosystems. The perspective of "ecologically unequal exchange" is receiving increasing attention in the academic debate, highlighting the unequal distribution of environmental costs and benefits across different regions, social groups, and generations. This theory posits that such inequalities arise from unaccounted dynamics of global development perpetuated by current environmental and trade policies. Through these, regions of the Core have achieved high levels of consumption and economic growth by exploiting the natural resources and labor of the global Periphery and Semi -periphery, while leaving behind a legacy of ecological degradation, social injustice, and debt. This article contributes to the understanding of ecologically unequal exchange theories, their evolution over time and related implications for sustainability policies. To do so, we perform a bibliometric analysis to assess the evolution and trends of ecologically unequal exchange literature in English -language journals followed by a literature review illustrating the origins of the concept, the theoretical debate, and empirical advances in the field. We find ecologically unequal exchange to be a rising research area with increasing empirical focus, fostered by interdisciplinary collaboration. Moreover, we juxtapose theories of ecologically unequal exchange with the contrasting paradigm of "Ecological Modernization" and the narratives of green growth and decoupling that underpin contemporary global sustainability policies, to elucidate key distinctions.

Keywords

Carbon-dioxide emissionsComercioCountriesCross-national analysisDegradationEcological debtEconomic-growthEnvironmental justiceEnvironmental load displacementEnvironmental policGlobal sustainabilityInequalityInternational-tradePanelPolítica ambientalPrebisch-singer hypothesisProtección ambientalSociologSostenibilidadTrade

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Environmental Science & Policy due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2024 there are still no calculated indicators, but in 2023, it was in position 84/358, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Environmental Sciences.

Independientemente del impacto esperado determinado por el canal de difusión, es importante destacar el impacto real observado de la propia aportación.

Según las diferentes agencias de indexación, el número de citas acumuladas por esta publicación hasta la fecha 2025-07-12:

  • WoS: 1

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-12:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 33 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

    It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

    Leadership analysis of institutional authors

    This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Italy.