{rfName}
A

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Miras-Avalos J.m.Author

Share

June 16, 2024
Publications
>
Article

A novel ArcGIS toolbox for estimating crop water demands by integrating the dual crop coefficient approach with multi-satellite imagery

Publicated to:Water. 11 (1): 38- - 2019-01-01 11(1), DOI: 10.3390/w11010038

Authors: Miguel Ramirez-Cuesta, Juan; Manuel Miras-Avalos, Jose; Salvador Rubio-Asensio, Jose; Intrigliolo, Diego S

Affiliations

CSIC - Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura (CEBAS) - Author
CSIC - Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura (CEBAS); Universidad de Santiago de Compostela - Author
CSIC, CEBAS, Murcia 30100, Spain - Author
Univ Santiago de Compostela, Escola Politecn Super Enxenaria, Campus Lugo, Lugo 27002, Spain - Author

Abstract

Keywords

Agricultural modellingArcpyConservationCrop water stressDecision-support-systemEnergy-balanceEvapotranspirationFao-56IrrigationLettuce cropsModelPythonSoilSoil water balanceYield

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Water due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2019, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Geography, Planning and Development.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 1.17. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 1.59 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 7.15 (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-04, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 25
  • Scopus: 29
  • Google Scholar: 30

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-04:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 105.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 105 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 7.6.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 9 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.